SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BITOO ALIAS SUBODH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['M C PANT', '', 'D S MEHTA', 'G A', '', 'MUKESH SINGH RAWAT']

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

First Bail Application No. 1058 of 2020

Bitoo @ Subodh

...Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

….Respondent

Present:-

Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate and Mr. Abhishek Diwakar Chamoli, Advocate for the

applicant.

Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, AGA for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. Mukesh Singh Rawat, Advocate for the complainant.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)

Applicant Bitoo @ Subodh, who is in judicial custody in

FIR No. 204 of 2020, under Section 306 IPC, Police Station Vikas

Nagar, District Dehradun, has sought his release on bail.

2.

This matter is taken up and heard through Video

Conferencing.

3.

This matter was listed yesterday. The Court posed certain

questions to learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the

complainant, but there was no reply to it, which are as follows:-

(i) Whether any obscene video was sent by the applicant to

the deceased and if so, whether the mobile of the

deceased was recovered and if so, when and who saw it?

(ii) Whether the applicant has written anything in the diary of

the deceased

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top