SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJENDRA SINGH and ORS – Appellant
Versus
ADD. CHIEF REVENUE COMMISSIONER and ORS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

(Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.)

Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2)(b)

Description of the case.

W.P. No. 690 (M/S) of 2004

Rajendra Singh and others.

Vs.

Additional Chief Revenue

Commissioner (Circuit Court)

Uttaranchal, Nainital and others

Approved for reporting

___________________

Not Approved for Reporting

Date of decision 6.8.2004.

Initial of Judge

HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. 690 (MS) of 2004

Rajendra Singh and others

……Petitioners

Vs

Additional Chief Revenue

Commissioner (Circuit Court)

Uttaranchal, Nainital and others

..…Respondents

Counsel for the petitioner Sh. Narayan Singh Negi

Standing Counsel for the respondents.

Dated:- 6-8-2004

Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J.

Heard Sh. Narayan Singh Negi learned counsel for the

petitioners and Standing counsel for the respondents.

By the present writ petition the petitioner have challenged the

order 22.7.2004 passed by the Additional Chief Revenue

Commissioner (Circuit Court), Uttaranchal, Nainital.

Brief facts giving rise to the present writ p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top