SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SATYE SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJESH NAGARKOTI', '', 'VISHAL SINGH MAHARA', 'HARSHIT SANWAL', 'PANKAJ KAPIL', 'C S C', 'SHOBHIT SAHARIA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Special Appeal No.112 of 2020

Satye Singh & others

… Appellants.

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

.. Respondents.

Dated: 8th July, 2020

Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.

Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.

Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. (Oral)

Heard Sri Harshit Sanwal, learned Counsel for the appellants,

Sri K.N. Joshi, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State

Government and Sri Shobhit Saharia, learned Standing Counsel for

the THDC.

2.

This intra-court appeal is preferred by the petitioners in Writ

Petition (M/S) No. 498 of 2020 aggrieved by the order passed by the

learned Single Judge on 26.02.2020 dismissing the writ petition on the

ground of delay.

3.

The appellants-writ petitioners approached this Court by way of

the writ petition on 15.02.2020 questioning the order passed by the

third respondent dated 27.12.2005 cancelling the eligibility of the

appellants-writ petitioners for rehabilitation, and the subsequent order

dated 29.1.2008 passed by the Director (Rehabilitation), Grievance

Redressal Forum, Tehri Dam Project. They sought a direction to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top