SATYE SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Special Appeal No.112 of 2020
Satye Singh & others
… Appellants.
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others
.. Respondents.
Dated: 8th July, 2020
Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.
Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.
Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. (Oral)
Heard Sri Harshit Sanwal, learned Counsel for the appellants,
Sri K.N. Joshi, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State
Government and Sri Shobhit Saharia, learned Standing Counsel for
the THDC.
2.
This intra-court appeal is preferred by the petitioners in Writ
Petition (M/S) No. 498 of 2020 aggrieved by the order passed by the
learned Single Judge on 26.02.2020 dismissing the writ petition on the
ground of delay.
3.
The appellants-writ petitioners approached this Court by way of
the writ petition on 15.02.2020 questioning the order passed by the
third respondent dated 27.12.2005 cancelling the eligibility of the
appellants-writ petitioners for rehabilitation, and the subsequent order
dated 29.1.2008 passed by the Director (Rehabilitation), Grievance
Redressal Forum, Tehri Dam Project. They sought a direction to th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.