HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Misc. Application No. 663 of 2022

Shajiya Begum and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and another ….Respondents

Present:

Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. for the State.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)

The challenge in this petition is made to the

order dated 22.04.2022, passed in Criminal Revision No.

257 of 2019, Pramod Kumar Vs. Kayyum and others,

passed by the court of 3^rd Additional Sessions Judge,

Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar (“the revision”). By

the impugned judgment and order, an application filed by

the private respondent under Section 156 (3) of the Code

of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code”) has been allowed.

2.

The respondent no. 2 Pramod Kumar Sharma is

Regional Manager in the Syndicate Bank (“the Bank”). He

moved an application under Section 156 (3) of the Code

against the petitioners and another. According to it, a

Kayyum took a loan from the Bank, in which, the

petitioner Fazil Khan stood as Guarantor and mortgaged

2

h