SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VIKRANT ALIAS VICKY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

First Bail Application No. 1369 of 2020

Vikrant @ Vicky

....Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

….Opposite party

Present:-

Mr. Pranav Singh, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. S.T. Bharadwaj, D.A.G for the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Applicant Vikrant @ Vicky, who is in judicial custody in

Crime No. 397 of 2020 under Sections 380, 457 and 411 IPC, Police

Station Laksar, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video

conferencing.

3.

FIR was lodged on 25.05.2020, in the case with the

averments that on 22.05.2020, theft was committed in the house of the

informant. Various household articles were stolen. According to the

case, some of the articles were recovered from the accussed and some

from co-accused.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant would argue that Mukul

@ Kama has already been granted bail, a fact, which is established by

production of bail order, which is Annexure no-3 to the bail

application.

5.

On behalf of the State, it is submi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top