VIKRANT ALIAS VICKY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 1369 of 2020
Vikrant @ Vicky
....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
….Opposite party
Present:-
Mr. Pranav Singh, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. S.T. Bharadwaj, D.A.G for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Applicant Vikrant @ Vicky, who is in judicial custody in
Crime No. 397 of 2020 under Sections 380, 457 and 411 IPC, Police
Station Laksar, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties through video
conferencing.
3.
FIR was lodged on 25.05.2020, in the case with the
averments that on 22.05.2020, theft was committed in the house of the
informant. Various household articles were stolen. According to the
case, some of the articles were recovered from the accussed and some
from co-accused.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant would argue that Mukul
@ Kama has already been granted bail, a fact, which is established by
production of bail order, which is Annexure no-3 to the bail
application.
5.
On behalf of the State, it is submi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.