Advocates:
['RAJESH JOSHI', '', 'AKHIL KUMAR SAH', 'LALIT SHARMA', 'GHANSHYAM JOSHI', 'M K GOYAL']

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Appeal from Order No. 155 of 2018

Ghananand Belwal and Others

… Appellants

Vs.

Dinesh Chandra Sharma and others

… Respondents

Advocate:

Mr. Ayush Aggarwal, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Akhil Kumar

Sah, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. M.K. Goyal, Advocate, for the respondent(s).

Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate, for the respondent(s).

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

The claimants (appellants herein) have preferred this

Appeal from Order under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles

Act, praying for enhancement of an award, then that as it

was determined by the impugned award dated 20th May

2017, to the tune of Rs. 16,28,107/-, which stood denied, in

its totality because the only compensation, which has been

awarded by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,

has been assessed to be Rs. 3,21,893/- with the interest

payable on it, as observed in the impugned order.

2.

The learnt counsel for the appellants has argued, that

in the proceedings, which were held before the learned

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, by way of MACP Case No.

36 of 2013, Ghananand Belwal & Others Vs. Dinesh Sharma

&