NAWAB SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 788 of 2021
Nawab Singh
…
Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others
… Respondents
Advocates :
Mr. Yogesh Pant, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Sachin Mohan Singh Mehta, Brief Holder, for the State of
Uttarakhand
Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Advocate, for respondent No. 3
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
(Via Video Conferencing)
On account of certain grounds of misconduct as prime facia
reflected in the order of suspension dated 19.04.2021, as well as,
that in the order dated 08.06.2021, by virtue of which the
attachment of the petitioner from the office of Additional Labour
Commissioner, Dehradun, he has been altered and attached to the
office of Labour Commissioner, Haldwani, district Nainital, had
been put to challenge.
2.
There are various contentions, which have been raised by
the learned counsel for the petitioner, while putting a challenge to
the two impugned orders dated 19.04.2021 and the order of his
attachment dated 08.06.2021, and in support of his contention,
the learned counsel for the petitioner has argued the case from the
perspective of the implicat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.