SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Om Prakash Shah AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['VIKAS PANDE', '', 'RANGOLI PUROHIT', 'SHUBHANG DOBHAL', 'H S RAWAL']

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (S/S) No. 104 of 2014

With

Recall Application No. MCC/7562/2021

Delay in Recall Application No. IA/7563/2021

Om Prakash Shah and others

Petitioners

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

… Respondents

Advocates :

Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, Advocate, for the petitioners

Mrs. Anjali Bhargava, Addl. CSC, for the State

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

This matter is listed today on a Delay Condonation

Application No. 7563 of 2021, explaining 1794 days of delay

which has chanced in filing the Recall Application, which has

been preferred by the petitioners, seeking recall of the order dated

12th August 2016 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

In fact, if the precise history of litigation is taken into

consideration, the petitioners, who are commonly placed, had

earlier too preferred a writ petition, being Writ Petition (S/S)

No. 988 of 2003, Om Prakash and others Vs. Nagar Pallika

Parishad and others, wherein they had prayed for the grant of

regular salary as admissible under law to the post of Clerk from

the date of regularisation of their services. The said writ petition

was d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top