SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NARENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['AYUSH NEGI', '', 'AMIT KAPRI', 'C S C']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (PIL) No. 68 of 2019

Narendra Kumar

...Petitioner

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

...Respondents

Mr. Ayush Negi and Mr. Amit Kapri, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Pradeep Joshi, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand-

respondents 1 to 3.

Dated: 30th May, 2019

Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.

Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.

Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. (Oral)

Heard Mr. Ayush Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner and

Mr. Pradeep Joshi, learned Standing Counsel for the State Government

and, with their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of

admission.

2.

The petitioner has invoked the public interest jurisdiction of this

Court seeking a mandamus directing the first respondent to constitute a

committee for management/trust of the affairs of the Purnagiri Temple;

a mandamus directing the first respondent to prepare a list of important

temples in terms of the order passed in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 151 of

2015 dated 20.06.2018; and a mandamus directing the first respondent

to appoint Commissi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top