NARENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 68 of 2019
Narendra Kumar
...Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others
...Respondents
Mr. Ayush Negi and Mr. Amit Kapri, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep Joshi, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand-
respondents 1 to 3.
Dated: 30th May, 2019
Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.
Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.
Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. (Oral)
Heard Mr. Ayush Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner and
Mr. Pradeep Joshi, learned Standing Counsel for the State Government
and, with their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of
admission.
2.
The petitioner has invoked the public interest jurisdiction of this
Court seeking a mandamus directing the first respondent to constitute a
committee for management/trust of the affairs of the Purnagiri Temple;
a mandamus directing the first respondent to prepare a list of important
temples in terms of the order passed in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 151 of
2015 dated 20.06.2018; and a mandamus directing the first respondent
to appoint Commissi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.