SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
SANJAY SINGH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (Criminal) No.856 of 2019

Sanjay Singh Yadav and others

....... Petitioners

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand & others

....Respondents

Mr. I.D. Paliwal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. S.S. Adhikari, AGA assisted by Mr. P.S. Uniyal, Brief Holder for the State of

Uttarakhand.

Mr. Kishore Rai, Advocate for respondent no.3.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India has been filed for quashing the F.I.R. No.184 of 2019, under Section

420 IPC, P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, on the ground of

amicable settlement between the parties.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

According to the F.I.R. petitioner no.5 Omveer Singh Yadav

and petitioner no.2, Neeru Yadav formed a Samiti and about 200 persons

were associated with it. One of the purposes was to assist the poor girls in

their marriage. But subsequently the petitioners and co-accused cheated

members and did not return the money. Respondent no.3, Mohd. Bilal is the

first informant.

4.

A joint c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top