HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
SANJAY SINGH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (Criminal) No.856 of 2019
Sanjay Singh Yadav and others
....... Petitioners
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand & others
....Respondents
Mr. I.D. Paliwal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. S.S. Adhikari, AGA assisted by Mr. P.S. Uniyal, Brief Holder for the State of
Uttarakhand.
Mr. Kishore Rai, Advocate for respondent no.3.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India has been filed for quashing the F.I.R. No.184 of 2019, under Section
420 IPC, P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, on the ground of
amicable settlement between the parties.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
According to the F.I.R. petitioner no.5 Omveer Singh Yadav
and petitioner no.2, Neeru Yadav formed a Samiti and about 200 persons
were associated with it. One of the purposes was to assist the poor girls in
their marriage. But subsequently the petitioners and co-accused cheated
members and did not return the money. Respondent no.3, Mohd. Bilal is the
first informant.
4.
A joint c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.