SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SUMITRA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
DINESH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Civil Revision No. 48 of 2021

Smt. Sumitra Devi and another

......... Revisionists

Vs.

Shri Dinesh and others

…….Respondents

Present:

Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate for the revisionists.

Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the respondents.

Civil Revision No. 49 of 2021

Smt. Sumitra Devi and another

......... Revisionists

Vs.

Shri Dinesh and others

…….Respondents

Present:

Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate for the revisionists.

Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Since common questions of law and facts are involved in

both these revisions, they are being decided by this common judgment.

2.

Civil Revision No. 49 of 2021 is directed against the

order dated 23.01.2021 passed in Original Suit No. 86 of 2015, Smt.

Sumitra Dvei and another v. Dinesh and others (for short, <the suit=),

by the court of Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Kashipur, District Udham Singh

Nagar. By the impugned order, a Commission was issued to identify

2

the disputed land, and revenue o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top