SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PRINCIPAL – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. 739 (MS) of 2008

State of Uttarakhand and others. …….Petitioners.

Versus

Sunil Kumar Singh Negi

and another. . .....….Respondents.

Present:

Mr. B.D. Kandpal, Deputy Advocate General for State of Uttarakhand / petitioner.

Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the respondent no. 1.

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J (Oral)

Present writ petition is filed assailing the order

dated 27.05.2005 passed by Assistant Labour Commissioner,

Garhwal, directing the State to pay Rs. 92,842/- to the workman

/ respondent no. 1.

Undisputed brief facts of the present case are that

workman / respondent no. 1, herein, was working as daily

wager with Rajkiya Khad Vigyan Prashikshan Kendra,

Kotdwar;

vide

order

dated

08.07.1992,

workman

was

retrenched from the service with effect from 09.07.1992; on the

request of the workman / respondent no. 1, herein, reference

was made to the Labour Court - As to whether retrenchment of

the workman / respondent no. 1, herein, with effect from

09.07.1992 was illegal or invalid and if yes, what relief

workman / r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top