SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

TIME EQUIPMENT PVT LTD OLD ITI BAREILLY ROAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['KARAN SINGH DUGTAL', '', 'NEERAJ PARIHAR', 'G A', 'RAJAN SINGH MEHRA', 'VIKRAM SINGH DHAPOLA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Compromise Application No. (I.A. No. 1 of 2022)

In

Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 1234 of 2022

Time Equipment Pvt. Ltd.

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand & others. .….Respondents

Mr. Neeraj Parihar and Mr. Karan Singh Dugta, Advocates for the petitioner.

Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. Rajan Singh Mehra and Mr. Vikram Singh Dhapola, Advocates for respondent

no. 3.

Dated: 30.06.2022

Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has

sought quashing of F.I.R. No. 0238 of 2022, under

Sections 420 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Haldwani,

District Nainital. Mr. Amit Rajput, Sales Manager has

been authorized by Director of M/s Time Equipment

Private Ltd. (petitioner herein) to sign every legal

document related to the aforesaid case. Authorization

letter has been annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the writ

petition.

3.

A compounding application, jointly signed by

counsel for respondent no. 3 and counsel for the petitioner

has been filed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top