ARCHNA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
SL.
No
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions and
Registrar’s order
with Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
W PSS 1 1 7 0 / 2 0 2 2
Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Mr.
Raveendra
Singh
Bisht,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Kanwar, Additional CSC,
for the State/ respondents no. 1 and 2.
Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate, for
the respondent no. 3.
Petitioner
responded
to
an
advertisement,
issued
by
Uttarakhand
Medical Service Selection Board, whereby
applications were invited for appointment as
Health
Worker
(Female).
According
to
petitioner, she belongs to ‘Other Backward
Class’ category, however, due to inadvertent
mistake she wrongly mentioned her category
as ‘Unreserved’ in her application form. In
this writ petition, petitioner has sought
following relief:
“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in
the nature of mandamus commanding the
respondents to permit the petitioner to
rectify the mistake in her application form
i.e. OBC category in place of General
Category for the appointment to the post of
Health Worker (Female) and to treat the
application form submitted by the petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.