SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ALI AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

First Bail Application No. 1409 of 2022

Moin Khan

...Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

...Respondent

Present:-

Mr. Manish Lohani, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. S.S. Adhikari, D.A.G. for the State.

With

First Bail Application No. 1487 of 2022

Ali Ahmad

...Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

...Respondent

Present:-

Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. S.S. Adhikari, D.A.G. for the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Both these bail applications arise from one and

the same FIR, therefore, they are being decided by this

common order.

2.

Applicants Moin Khan and Ali Ahmad are in

judicial custody in FIR No. 81 of 2022, Police Station

Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. Applicant Moin

Khan is in judicial custody under Section 307 IPC and

2

applicant Ali Ahmad is in judicial custody under sections

307, 120B and 34 IPC. They have sought their release on

bail.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the record.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top