SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRADEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


SL.

No

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions and

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

C4 8 2 No. 1 0 1 9 / 2 0 2 1

Hon ’ble N.S. Dh an ik , J.

Mr. Veer Kunwar Singh, Advocate, for the

accused applicants.

Mr. S.S. Adhikari, AGA, assisted by Mr.

Balwinder Singh, Brief Holder for the State.

Mr.

Ravi

Bisht,

Advocate,

for

the

complainant/ victim.

This

C482

application

along

with

the

compounding application (I A 1/ 2021) has been filed

to

quash

the

chargesheet

dated

18.4.2021,

cognizance/ summoning

order

dated

01/ 26.4.2021.2021 and the entire proceedings of

Criminal Case No. 210 of 2021, under Sections 420,

120B

IPC,

pending

before

the

Chief

Judicial

Magistrate, Bageshwar.

It has been stated in the compounding

application

that

parties

have

entered

into

compromise and amicably settled their dispute and

now the complainant/ victim does not have any

grievance with the accused applicants. Accused

applicant no. 1 is in jail and he is being represented

by his brother Rajnish Kumar. Rajnish Kumar and

accused applicant no. 2 and the complainant/ victim,

duly identifie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top