SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
TAZAMMUL @ BHURA – Appellant
Versus
CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, ROORKEE – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT

NAINITAL

WRIT PETITION No. 957 of 2004 (M/S)

Tazammul @ Bhura ---Petitioner

Vs.

Deputy Director of Consolidation/Collector

Haridwar & Others. –Respondents

With

WRIT PETITION No. 460 of 2004 (M/S)

Riyashat @ Kallu & another ---Petitioners

Vs.

D.D.C. Haridwar & others --

Respondents

With

WRIT PETITION No. 467 of 2004 (M/S)

Riyashat @ Kallu & another ---Petitioners

Vs.

D.D.C. & others --Respondents

And

WRIT PETITION No. 958 of 2004 (M/S)

Tazammul @ Bhura ---Petitioner

Vs.

Deputy Director of Consolidation/Collector

Haridwar

--Respondent

Present :

Mr. Lok Pal Singh and Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocates, for the parties.

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. (Oral)

Present petitions are filed assailing the orders dated

08.03.2001 and 08.11.2001 passed by Consolidation

Officer, Roorkee; judgment and order dated 20.02.2003

pas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top