SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KHADI and VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION – Appellant
Versus
PRECRIBED AUTHORITY and ANR – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

(Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.)

(Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2) (b)

Description of the case.

WP No. 474 of 02 (M/S)

Khadhi & Village Industries Commission

VS

Prescribed Authority

Industrial Tribunal & others.

Approved for reporting

________________

Not approved for reporting

Date of decision: 07.08.2006

Initial of Judge

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT

NAINITAL

WRIT PETITION NO. 474 (MS) OF 2002

Khadhi & Village Industries Commission,

Through its Director having its State Office

At General Mahadev Singh Road,

Kanwali, Dehradun. ……………Petitioner

Versus

1.

Prescribed Authority, Industrial Tribunal, Uttaranchal,

Haldwani.

2.

Sri Roshan Lal, S/o Sri Mohan Singh, R/o Village

Binikhera, District-Udham Singh Nagar.

………….Respondents.

&

WRIT PETITION NO. 475 (MS) OF 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top