HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KHADI and VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION – Appellant
Versus
PRECRIBED AUTHORITY and ANR – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
(Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.)
(Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2) (b)
Description of the case.
WP No. 474 of 02 (M/S)
Khadhi & Village Industries Commission
VS
Prescribed Authority
Industrial Tribunal & others.
Approved for reporting
________________
Not approved for reporting
Date of decision: 07.08.2006
Initial of Judge
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT
NAINITAL
WRIT PETITION NO. 474 (MS) OF 2002
Khadhi & Village Industries Commission,
Through its Director having its State Office
At General Mahadev Singh Road,
Kanwali, Dehradun. ……………Petitioner
Versus
1.
Prescribed Authority, Industrial Tribunal, Uttaranchal,
Haldwani.
2.
Sri Roshan Lal, S/o Sri Mohan Singh, R/o Village
Binikhera, District-Udham Singh Nagar.
………….Respondents.
&
WRIT PETITION NO. 475 (MS) OF 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.