SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PREM CHAND SAINI – Appellant
Versus
STATE AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Criminal Revision No. 38 of 2007

Rajani Kant Uniyal. ………. Revisionist.

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

and others. ....…. Respondents

Present :

Sri Karan Anand, Advocate for the revisionist.

Sri Arvind Vashisht, Advocate for the respondent nos. 2 and 3.

With

Criminal Revision No. 91 of 2007

Prem Chand Saini. ………. Revisionist.

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

and another. ....…. Respondents

Present :

Sri Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the revisionist.

Sri Arvind Vashisht, Advocate for the respondent nos. 2 and 3.

Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.

1.

As both these revisions, titled above, arise out of

same judgment and order dated 15.02.2007 passed by learned

Sessions Judge, Dehradun while adjudicating the criminal

revisions no. 18 of 2007 and 19 of 2007, hence, both these

revisions are being disposed of by this single judgment.

2.

Having heard learned counsel for all the parties, it

transpires th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top