HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

(Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.)

Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2)(b)

Description of the case.

W.P. No. 704/2002 (M/S)

Shyam Singh

Vs

Seema and others.

Approved for reporting

___________________

Not Approved for Reporting

Date of decision 7.8.2004.

Initial of Judge

 

HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. 704(MS) of 2002

Shyam Singh

S/o Sh. Lallu Singh

R/o Village Nagal Chittar

Tehsil- Khurja

Dist. Bulandsahar

…… Applicant/petitioner

Vs

Seema D/o Late Sh. Hub Lal

And others.

…..Respondents

Counsel for the petitioner Sh. Sharad Sharma

Counsel for the respondents Sh. R.Srivastava

Dated: 7-8-2004

Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J.

Heard Sh. Sharad Sharma learned counsel for the

petitioner and Sh. R. Srivastava counsel for the respondents.

By the present writ petition the order dt. 11-7-2002 has

been challenged.

Brief stated according to the case of the petitioner he

entered into a matrimonial alliance with Jogindar Kaur but due

to certain misunderstanding, the m