SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DUKHTAR JAHAN andV ORS – Appellant
Versus
A.D.J. and ORS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

(Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.)

(Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2)(b)

Description of the case.

WPMS No. 1173 of 2003

Dukhatar Jahan

Vs.

Additional District Judge II F.T.C.

Approved for reporting.

__________________

Not approved for reporting

Date of decision 18.05.2006

Initial of Judge

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT

NAINITAL

WRIT PETITION NO. 1173 (MS) OF 2003

1.

Dukhtar Jahan, W/o Mohd. Hassan,

R/o Ward No. 6, Kichha, Tehsil-Khatima,

District-Udham Singh Nagar.

2.

Kamal Ahmad, S/o Munna Phalwala,

R/o Ward No. 6, Kichha, Tehsil – Khatima

District-Udham Singh Nagar.

………Petitioners.

Versus

1.

Addl. District Judge, II, F.T.C., District-Udham Singh

Nagar.

2.

Khalik Ahmad, S/o Habib Ahmad,

R/o Ward No. 6, Kichha, Tehsil – Khatima,

District-Udham Singh Nagar.

………….Respondents.

dated: 18.05.2006

Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J.

Heard Sri B.S. Khanka, Advocate for the petitioners,

Standing counsel for the respondent no.1 and Sri M.C. Pandey,

Advocate for the respondent no.2.

By t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top