SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
POOJA GOEL – Appellant
Versus
KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI HARIDWAR – Respondent


Advocates:
['SIDDHARTHA SINGH', '', 'P S BISHT', 'KSHITIJ SAH', 'C S C']

SL.

No

Date

Office Notes, reports,

orders or proceedings

or directions and

Registrar’s order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

AO No.263 of 2022

With

AO No.264 of 2022

AO No.265 of 2022

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for the

appellants.

Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General

and Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, Addl. C.S.S. for the

State of Uttarakhand.

In all these three Appeal From Order in each

of the respective appeals, the plaintiff/appellants

herein had put a challenge, to the order of a

common

date

i.e.

01.07.2022,

as

it

has

beenrendered by the court of IIIrd Civil Judge (Sr.

Div.), Haridwar in Suit No.328 of 2021 Pooja

Goyal vs. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and Others,

Suit No.326 of 2021 Kamlesh Goyal vs. Krishi

Utpadan Mandi Samiti and Others and Suit No.327

of 2021 Shalini Goyal vs. Krishi Utpadan Mandi

Samiti and Others.

In fact in each of these suits, the temporary

injunction application, which was sought to be

granted by the plaintiffs by invoking the provisions

of Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the C.P.C., was qua the

recovery citation, which was issued for recovering

the amount due t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top