HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
POOJA GOEL – Appellant
Versus
KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI HARIDWAR – Respondent
SL.
No
Date
Office Notes, reports,
orders or proceedings
or directions and
Registrar’s order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
AO No.263 of 2022
With
AO No.264 of 2022
AO No.265 of 2022
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for the
appellants.
Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General
and Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, Addl. C.S.S. for the
State of Uttarakhand.
In all these three Appeal From Order in each
of the respective appeals, the plaintiff/appellants
herein had put a challenge, to the order of a
common
date
i.e.
01.07.2022,
as
it
has
beenrendered by the court of IIIrd Civil Judge (Sr.
Div.), Haridwar in Suit No.328 of 2021 Pooja
Goyal vs. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and Others,
Suit No.326 of 2021 Kamlesh Goyal vs. Krishi
Utpadan Mandi Samiti and Others and Suit No.327
of 2021 Shalini Goyal vs. Krishi Utpadan Mandi
Samiti and Others.
In fact in each of these suits, the temporary
injunction application, which was sought to be
granted by the plaintiffs by invoking the provisions
of Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the C.P.C., was qua the
recovery citation, which was issued for recovering
the amount due t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.