SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAM SWARUP AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Appeal No. 1688 of 2001

(Old No. 1553 of 1997)

1.

Ram Swarup

S/o Shri Sunder Lal

R/o Lambarpur Par Farm, Shyampur

Khadri, P.S. Rishikesh

District Dehradun

2.

Pappu @ Satya Prakash

S/o Shri Anand Prakash

R/o Town Rudraprayag, District Chamoli

……….Appellants

(In Jail)

Versus

State of U.P. (now State of Uttarakhand)

…………Respondent

Shri Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate, present for the appellants.

Shri M.A. Khan, and Shri B.S. Parihar, Brief Holders, present for the

state.

Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.

This appeal , preferred under section 374 of

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (for short

Cr.P.C) is directed against the judgment and order

dated 29.08.1997 passed by Sessions Judge, Tehri

Garhwal, in Sessions Trial No. 11 of 1996

-2-

whereby said court has convicted the appellants

namely Ram Swarup and Pappu @ Satya Prakash,

under section 376 and 323 read with section 34 of

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short I.P.C.). Each one

of them has been sentenced by the trial court to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top