SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting

(Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b)

Description of Case

Criminal Appeal No. 652 of 2003

Pratap Singh

Versus

State

Date of decision :- July 27, 2005

A.F.R. (Approved for Reporting)

___________________________

Not approved for reporting

Date :- July 27, 2005 Initial of Judge

Note :- Bench Reader will attach this at the top of the first page of the judgment when

it is put up before the Judge for signature.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL

AT NAINITAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 652 of 2001

(OLD NO.2086 OF 1987

Pratap Singh S/o Shoban Singh

R/o village Naroni

P.S. Mukhteshwar

District Nainital ….. Appellant

Versus

State of Uttaranchal …. Respondent

Mr. Dharam Veer learned counsel for the appellant

Mrs. Nishat Intzar learned AGA for the State.

Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J.

1.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top