SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
UDIT GARG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


SL.

No

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions and

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

WPCRL No. 1476 of 2022

With

WPCRL No. 1479 of 2022

Hon ’ble S.K. Mish r a, J.

Mr.

Bhupesh

Kandpal,

the

learned

counsel for the petitioners.

Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, the learned

A.G.A. for the State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

By filing these two writ applications, the

writ petitioners have sought issuance of writ

in the nature of certiorari quashing the FIR

dated 21.07.2022, registered as FIR No. 0017

of 2022, registered under Section 75, 66C,

66D of the Information Technology Act 2000

and under Section 120B and 420 of the Penal

Code at P.S. Cyber PS, District Dehradun. The

petitioners also prayed for issuance of writ in

the nature of mandamus directing respondent

nos. 1 to 3 to comply with the mandatory

provisions of Section 41A of the Code as well

as the directions given by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar

vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273, in

relation to the FIR as mentioned above.

It is brought to our notice that a

separate contempt petition has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top