HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Second Bail Application No. 226 of 2023
Ajay Kumar
.... Applicant
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand ..... Respondent
Mr. Akhil Kumar Shah, counsel for the applicant.
Mr. S. S. Adhikari, Deputy Advocate General along with Ms. Shivangi
Gangwar, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Dated: 17.08.2023
Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. (Oral)
Applicant Ajay Kumar, who is in judicial
custody in FIR No. 216 of 2022, under Sections 420,
467, 468, 471, 474, 120-B & 34 IPC, Police Station
Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his
release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the material available on file.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant/accused
would submit that the only allegation against the
applicant/accused is that blank degrees of University of
Meghalaya were received at the instance and pointing
out of applicant/accused and such degrees do not come
in the category of Valuable Security, therefore, the
offence under Section 467 IPC is not made out against
the applicant/accused. He would furt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.