SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
GAURAV CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Second Bail Application No. 228 of 2023

Gaurav Chand

.... Applicant

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand ..... Respondent

Mr. Akhil Kumar Shah, counsel for the applicant.

Mr. S. S. Adhikari, Deputy Advocate General along with Ms. Shivangi

Gangwar, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

Dated: 17.08.2023

Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. (Oral)

Applicant Gaurav Chand, who is in judicial

custody in FIR No. 216 of 2022, under Sections 420,

467, 468, 471, 474, 120-B & 34 IPC, Police Station

Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his

release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the material available on file.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant/accused

would submit that the only allegation against the

applicant/accused is that blank degrees of University of

Meghalaya were received at the instance and pointing

out of applicant/accused and such degrees do not come

in the category of Valuable Security, therefore, the

offence under Section 467 IPC is not made out against

the applicant/accused. He would f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top