GAURAV TYAGI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
SL.
No
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
proceedings or
directions and
Registrar’s order
with Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
BA1 No.2443 of 2021
Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.
Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the
applicants.
Mr. Pankaj Joshi, learned B.H. for the State.
Accused– Gaurav Tyagi and Ashu Tyagi have
sought their release on bail in connection with Case
Crime/FIR No.95/2019, u/s 307, 120-B IPC,
registered at P.S. SIDCUL, District Haridwar.
It is argued that the accused have been falsely
implicated; they are languishing in jail since
29.01.2021; there is no criminal history against
them; the statement of injured has already been
recorded before the trial court in which she did not
support the prosecution story; they are ready to
furnish the sureties; and they may be granted bail.
Per contra, learned counsel for the State
opposed for bail but admitted that there is no
criminal history against them.
In the present matter, the accused are
languishing in jail since 29.01.2021 having no
criminal history; as per the statement of injured; she
did not make any allegation against the applicants;
accordingly, she was declared
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.