SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KAVI KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Misc. Application No.1288 of 2021

Kavi Kumar

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and another ….Respondents

Present:

Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A for the State.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)

The challenge in this petition is made to the

proceedings of Criminal Case No. 4719 of 2020, State Vs.

Kavi Kumar, under Sections 323, 326B, 498A, 506 IPC,

pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the record.

3.

Initially, notices were issued to respondent no.2,

but notice has yet not been served.

4.

Today, learned counsel for the petitioner would

submit that he does not press the petition on merit. He

restricts his submission to the extent that the direction may

be given to the court below that the bail application of the

petitioner may be decided in terms of the judgment passed

2

in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of

Investigation and anoth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top