SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MOHD AAZAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2248 of 2020

7th JUNE, 2021

Between:

Mohd Aazam S/o Mohd. Hanif

R/o Village-Jagganathpur,

P.S. Bazpur,

District- Udham Singh Nagar

…….Applicant

and

State of Uttarakhand.

…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant :

Mr. D.C.S. Rawat.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. T.C. Aggarwal, learned

Deputy Advocate General

for the State.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This bail application has been filed for grant of

regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.484 of 2020,

registered with Police Station-Bazpur, District Udham

Singh Nagar for the offence punishable under Sections

420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 120-B of I.P.C., Section 66-C &

66-D of the Information Technology Act.

2.

On the secret information, forged Ravanne

(royalty slip) and forged seal were recovered from the

possession of Mohd Akram, a co-accused. The F.I.R. was

registered on 01.11.2020 against the co-accused Mohd.

Akram. On the basis of the statement of co-accused Mohd.

2

Akram, the present applicant was a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top