SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Dilshad Alvi – Appellant
Versus
Ikrar Ahmed – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. 2138 of 2015 (M/S)

Dilshad Alvi

…..Petitioner

Versus

Sri Ikrar Ahmed

….Respondent

Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. (Oral)

Present

petition

is

preferred

assailing

the

judgment and order dated 26.08.2014, passed by the

Civil Jude (Junior Division), Dehradun in O.S. No. 126

of 2013, Dilshad Alvi Vs. Ikram Ahmad and others,

whereby learned Trial Court was pleased to hold that

suit simplicitor for permanent prohibitory injunction is

barred by Section 41 (H) of the Specific Relief Act as well

as judgment and order dated 19th January, 2015, passed

by the First Addl. District Judge, Dehradun, whereby

appeal filed by the plaintiff petitioner herein was

dismissed.

Brief facts of the present case, inter alia, are that

plaintiffs have filed Civil Suit seeking permanent

prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants not to

transfer the suit property in favour of third party saying

agreement to sell was executed between the parties on

04.10.2012, however, same was never got registered;

when plaintiff requested the defendant to ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top