Advocates:
['P C PETSHALI', '', 'KAUSHAL SAH JAGATI', 'G A', 'VINOD CHANDRA', 'B N MolakhiR P Singh']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Revision No. 491 of 2022

Deepak Danu

....Revisionist

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and Another

..... Respondents

Mr. P.C. Petshali and Mr. Kaushal Sah Jagati, Advocates for the

revisionist.

Mr. V.S. Rathore, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

Ms. Sonali Shah, Advocate holding brief of Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Advocate

for the accused.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

The challenge in this revision is made to

order dated 20.08.2022, passed in Special Sessions Trial

No.412 of 2021, State Versus Goldy Rajiv Santhoji, by

the court of Additional Sessions Judge/FTSC/Rudrapur,

District-Udham Singh Nagar (“the case”). The revisionist

is aggrieved by that portion of order, by which charge

under Section 8 instead of Section 9 of the Protection of

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (“the POCSO

Act”) has been framed on the accused and also that

portion of order is put to challenge, by which PW1 and

PW2

have

been

summoned

for

further

cross-

examination.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the record.

2

3.

Facts

neces