IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

WTIT PETITION NO. 2979 OF 2001 (MS)

(Old No. 27246/99)

U.P.State Road Transport Corporation …………..Petitioner.

Versus

State of U.P. & Others.

………….Respondents.

Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

8 ^th August, 2008

Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J.

Present writ petition is directed against the award /

order dated 30.1.1999 in Adjudication Case No. 26 / 98

contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition, whereby

the respondent no. 3 has been directed to be reinstated

along with compensation of Rs. 5,000/- and Rs. 500/- as

litigation expenses.

2.

A dispute was referred, vide notification No. 744-

57/Dehradun C.P. 61/97 dated 19.1.1998 which was

registered as Adjudication Case No. 26 / 98. The reference

was made in the following terms:

“Whether the termination of services of Workman

Sri Ravi Kumar, daily wager with effect from

26.10.1994 is unjustified and / or illegal, if yes, to

what benefit/relief the concerned employee is

entitled to and to what extent?”

3.

Brief facts of the case are that the respondent no. 2

was working as