IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 1692 of 2022

Shafat Ali

.....…….

Petitioner

versus

State of Uttarakhand & others...…………. Respondents

Ms. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the writ applicant.

Mr. J. S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Ms.

Manisha Rana, learned AGA for the State.

-----------

Judgement dated: 07.09.2022

Hon’ble Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.

Upon hearing the learned counsels, the Court made the

following Order.

1.

By filing the writ application, the petitioner has

prayed for the following reliefs:

(i) A writ, order in the nature of certiorari

quashing the impugned FIR No. 805 of 2022,

under Sections 143, 186, 504, 353, 341 IPC,

PS Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar (Annexure

No. 1).

(ii) Writ, order or direction in the nature of

mandamus commanding the respondent no.1

& 2 not to harass the petitioner in view of the

judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in

Criminal Appeal No. 1277 of 2014, Anresh

Kumar vs. State of Bihar and other, and thus,

a due process of law shall be followed as