HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAM CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
LOKESH KUMAR – Respondent
SL.
No
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
proceedings or
directions and
Registrar’s order
with Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS No. 2180 of 2022
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate for the
petitioner.
Mr. Nikhil Singhal, Advocate for the
respondent.
Petitioner is aggrieved by rejection of
his temporary injunction application by
the trial court. His appeal filed under
Order 43 Rule 1(r) of C.P.C. has also been
dismissed. Thus, he has challenged the
order passed by trial court as well as the
appellate court in this writ petition.
Petitioner filed a suit for cancellation
of sale deed against Lokesh Kumar
(respondent),
which
is
numbered
as
Original Suit No. 177 of 2016. As per the
plaint allegation, the sale deed dated
06.06.2016 was procured by Lokesh
Kumar by playing fraud; petitioner had
agreed for execution of agreement to sell
the land, however, sale deed was executed
without paying sale consideration to him.
In the said suit, petitioner filed a
temporary injunction application with the
prayer that defendant be directed to
maintain status quo qua nature and
possession in respect of the su
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.