SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAM CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
LOKESH KUMAR – Respondent


SL.

No

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders or

proceedings or

directions and

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

WPMS No. 2180 of 2022

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate for the

petitioner.

Mr. Nikhil Singhal, Advocate for the

respondent.

Petitioner is aggrieved by rejection of

his temporary injunction application by

the trial court. His appeal filed under

Order 43 Rule 1(r) of C.P.C. has also been

dismissed. Thus, he has challenged the

order passed by trial court as well as the

appellate court in this writ petition.

Petitioner filed a suit for cancellation

of sale deed against Lokesh Kumar

(respondent),

which

is

numbered

as

Original Suit No. 177 of 2016. As per the

plaint allegation, the sale deed dated

06.06.2016 was procured by Lokesh

Kumar by playing fraud; petitioner had

agreed for execution of agreement to sell

the land, however, sale deed was executed

without paying sale consideration to him.

In the said suit, petitioner filed a

temporary injunction application with the

prayer that defendant be directed to

maintain status quo qua nature and

possession in respect of the su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top