SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ramesh Chandra Khulbe
SHUBHAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


SL.

No

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders or

proceedings or

directions and

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

BAI No.2735 of 2021

Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.

Mr. Pranav Singh and Mr. Mayank Joshi,

learned counsel for the applicant.

Mr. V.K. Jemini, learned DAG for the State.

Accused–Shubham has sought his release on

bail

in

connection

with

Case

Crime/FIR

No.394/2021, u/s 384, 385, 506, 120-B IPC,

registered at P.S. SIDCUL, District Haridwar.

It is argued that the accused has been falsely

implicated; he is languishing in jail since

08.10.2021; he has no criminal history; he is ready

to furnish the sureties and may be granted bail.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State

opposed for bail but fairly admitted that he has no

criminal history and the matter falls under Section

385 IPC not under Section 384 IPC as per the FIR.

The accused is languishing in jail since

08.10.2021; he has no criminal history; as per the

FIR, although there was a threat given by the

accused, but no money was received by the accused;

as per the FIR the matter falls under Section 385

IPC not under Section 384 IPC, which is bailable

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top