HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ramesh Chandra Khulbe
SHUBHAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
SL.
No
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
proceedings or
directions and
Registrar’s order
with Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
BAI No.2735 of 2021
Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.
Mr. Pranav Singh and Mr. Mayank Joshi,
learned counsel for the applicant.
Mr. V.K. Jemini, learned DAG for the State.
Accused–Shubham has sought his release on
bail
in
connection
with
Case
Crime/FIR
No.394/2021, u/s 384, 385, 506, 120-B IPC,
registered at P.S. SIDCUL, District Haridwar.
It is argued that the accused has been falsely
implicated; he is languishing in jail since
08.10.2021; he has no criminal history; he is ready
to furnish the sureties and may be granted bail.
Per contra, learned counsel for the State
opposed for bail but fairly admitted that he has no
criminal history and the matter falls under Section
385 IPC not under Section 384 IPC as per the FIR.
The accused is languishing in jail since
08.10.2021; he has no criminal history; as per the
FIR, although there was a threat given by the
accused, but no money was received by the accused;
as per the FIR the matter falls under Section 385
IPC not under Section 384 IPC, which is bailable
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.