SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Shanti Prasad Bhadani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates:
['KARAN ANAND', '', 'D C S RAWAT', 'G A']

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

First Bail Application No. 1287 of 2013

Order on the Bail application of accused.

CRIMINAL SIDE

Shanti Prasad Bhadani

S/o Khima Nand,

R/o Upper Nathanpur,

Dehradun (Uttarakhand)

………… Applicant (In Jail)

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

………..Respondent

Arising out of Case Crime No. 184 of 2013,

Under Section 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 304-B I.P.C. and 3 &

4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

P.S. Nehru Colony.

District Dehradun.

Dated: December 4, 2013

Hon’ble V.K. Bist J.

Mr. Karan Anand and Mr. DCS Rawat, Advocates

for the accused/applicant.

Mr. Vijay Khanduri, Brief Holder for the State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused

the record.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that

the applicant is father-in-law of the victim having age of

more than 65 years and is suffering from ailments; he is

innocent and has nothing to do with the present case. It is

submitted that in the statement of the victim recorded

under Section 161 Cr.P.C. by the Investigating Officer, the

victim has stated that she got burnt injuries due to burst

of the stove on which she was cooking fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top