SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ramesh Chandra Khulbe
AJIT KUMAR CHATURVEDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARKAHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Misc. Appl. (C482) No. 905 of 2020

Ajit Kumar Chaturvedi & ors. .…. Applicants

Versus

The State of Uttarakhand & ors.

…… Respondents

Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants.

Mr. Subhash Tygai Bhardwaj, learned Dy. Advocate General for the State.

Mr. Shikhar Kacker and Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for the

private respondent.

Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.

By means of present application, filed under Section

482 Cr.P.C., the applicants have sought quashing of the

order dated 23.12.2020 passed by the Addl. Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Roorkee in Miscellaneous Application No. 108

of 2020, Manpal Sharma vs. Ajit Kumar Chaturvedi and

ors.

2.

Heard.

3.

Facts, in brief, are that an application was moved by

respondent no. 4 Manpal Sharma under Section 156(3)

Cr.P.C. before the Addl. CJM, Roorkee; on the basis of

said application, the concerned Court directed the

Inspector, Kotwali Civil Lines to register the FIR and

investigate the matter vide order dated 23.12.2020;

aggrieved it, the applicants filed the application under

Section 482 Cr.P.C.

4.

It is a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top