Advocates:
['M S BISHT', 'ASTT S G', '', 'D C S RAWAT']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (S/S) No. 3136 of 2018

Uday Singh

.......Petitioner

Vs.

Union of India & others

…..Respondents

Mr. M.S. Bisht, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, CGSC, for the Union of India/1, 2 , 3 , 4 and 5.

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J (Oral)

The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was

enrolled after being appointed on the post of the Driver with the

respondent department, with his initial posting which was made on 2^nd

November 1977, when he was posted at SSB, Teju, Arunachal

Pradesh, and after completing his satisfactory training, and during the

tenor of his services, he was thereafter posted at different SSB centres,

where he performed his duties. As per the scheme of extension of

benefit of ACP, a regular member of the service, who has rendered 10

years, 20 years or 30 years of satisfactory services respectively, on

completion of the aforesaid breakup of the services, would be entitled

for the grant of the benefits of first ACP, second ACP and third ACP.

2.

The grievance of the petitioner is, tha