SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KASHMIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER KUMAUN MANDAL NAINITAL – Respondent


SL.

No

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders or

proceedings or

directions and

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

2 9 .0 9 .2 0 2 2

WPMS No.2397 of 2022

Hon ’ble San j aya Ku m ar Mish r a, J.

Mrs. Farida Siddiqui with Mr. Pankaj

Goshwami, Advocates for the petitioner.

Mr. Yogesh Pandey, learned Addl.

C.S.C. for the State.

By filing of this writ application, the

petitioner has sought for the following

reliefs: -

“(i) Issue a writ, order or

direction in the nature of certiorari

quashing the impugned order dated

25.01.2021 (Annexure-3) passed by

Additional

District

Magistrate

(Revenue

and

Finance),

Udham

Singh Nagar and impugned recovery

citation

dated

01.09.2022

(Annexure-4)

issued

by

Tehsildar

Bazpur, Udham Singh Nagar.

(ii) Any other order or direction

which this Hon’ble Court may deem

fit and proper in the circumstances of

the case.

(iii) Award cost of the petition.”

It is not disputed at this stage that

the petitioner was noticed for showing

cause as to why penalty under the Mines

and

Minerals

(Development

and

Regulation) Act should be imposed upon

him.

It is borne out from the records t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top