SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
LAKHVINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['HARSHPAL SEKHON', '', 'SHAILABH PANDEY', 'G A']

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Anticipatory Bail Application No. 199 of 2022

Simran Jit Kaur alias

Rajvinder Kaur alias Rajvinder ...Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and another ...Respondents

With

Anticipatory Bail Application No. 220 of 2022

Sukhdev Singh

...Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and another ...Respondents

Anticipatory Bail Application No. 260 of 2022

Lakhvinder Singh and others ...Applicants

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others ...Respondents

Present:-

Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the applicants.

Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. for the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Since all the anticipatory bail applications arise

from one and the same FIR, they are being decided by this

common order.

2

2.

Applicants Simran Jit Kaur Alias Rajvinder Kaur

alias Rajvinder, Sukhdev Singh, Lakhvinder Singh, Kulwant

Singh and Balvinder Kaur seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.

245 of 2022, under Sections 420, 467, 468,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top