SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHD ARAFEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['B B SHARMA', '', 'A K SHARMA', 'C S C']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI

AND

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.C. KHULBE

22ND NOVEMBER, 2022

SPECIAL APPEAL No. 328 OF 2022

Between:

Mohd. Arafeen.

…Appellant

and

State of Uttarakhand and others.

…Respondents

Counsel for the appellant.

:

Mr. B.B. Sharma, the learned counsel.

Counsel for the respondent nos. 1. :

Mr. Anil Kumar Bisht, the learned

Additional Chief Standing Counsel for

the State of Uttarakhand.

Counsel for the respondent nos. 2

and 3.

:

Mr. Sandeep Kothari, the learned

counsel.

JUDGMENT : (per Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)

This Special Appeal is directed against the

common judgment passed by the learned Single Judge on

24.08.2022 in four Writ Petitions, including the Writ

Petition preferred by the present appellant, being Writ

Petition (M/S) No. 1661 of 2022, titled “Mohd. Arafeen v.

State of Uttarakhand and others”.

2.

By the impugned judgment, the learned Single

Judge dismissed the said four Writ Petitions, wherein the

appellant/

writ

petitioner

herein,

and

other

writ

2

petitioners, sought a restraint against th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top