Advocates:
['HARSHIT SANWAL', '', 'B D Pandey', 'G A', 'Pankaj Singh Chauhan', 'AMAR MURTI SHUKLA']

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Misc. Application No. 1771 of 2021

Anirudha Bhatt

…........ Petitioner

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and another

…..... Respondents

Present : Mr. B.D. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. for the State.

Mr. R.P.Nautiyal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Pankaj Singh

Chauhan, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3.

Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, Advocate for respondent no.4

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

The petitioner lodged an FIR on 23.10.2015, at

Police Station Mallital, District Nainital, under Sections

341, 323 and 506 of IPC. Based on which, Case Crime No.

57 of 2015 was lodged. It appears that the police, after

investigation, submitted charge sheet and proceedings of

the Criminal Case No. 18 of 2016, State vs. Amardeep

Mann & Others were instituted, in the court of Chief

Judicial Magistrate Nainital (for short, “the case”). In the

case, applications under Section 311 of the Code of

Criminal

Procedure,

1973

(for

short,

“the Code”) were filed, which were rejected. The history of

these applications is as hereunder:-