HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
M/S G R REALCON PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN – Respondent
SL.
No
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS Nos. 2132, 2615, 2617 and 2618 of 2022
Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.
Shri Digvijay Singh Bisht, learned counsel for
the petitioner.
Shri G.S. Negi, learned Standing Counsel for
the State.
Petitioner has filed a batch of writ petitions
praying for the same relief, therefore, with the
consent of learned counsel for the parties, all the
writ petitions are heard together and disposed of
by this common order.
Petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of
Certiorari for quashing the recovery citation dated
07.04.2022, 06.08.2021, 03.09.2022 and 06.08.2021, so
far as it relates to recovery charges to the tune of
10% of the recoverable amount.
This issue is no more res integra in view of
the fact that the Full Bench of the Allahabad High
Court in the case of Mahrajwa and others Vs. State
of U.P. and others, 2013 SCC Online All 14291, has
held that if the State Authorities have not recovered
any amount of the citation through coercive
process, then they would not be entitled to
recovery charges. Similar vi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.