SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
JASBEER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['HARSHPAL SEKHON', '', 'SHAILABH PANDEY', 'G A']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Criminal Misc. Application No. 1941 of 2022

Jasbeer Kaur

.....Applicant

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and others

…..Respondents

Present:-

Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. T.C. Aggarwal, learned Deputy Advocate General along with

Ms. Lata Negi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J (Oral)

The applicant to the present C-482

application, has put a challenge to the cognizance

order dated 16.04.2018, as well as the order dated

06.09.2022, which has been passed by the court

of learned Judicial Magistrate/1st Additional Civil

Judge, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, in

Criminal Case No. 3071 of 2018 “Paramjeet Singh

Vs. Smt. Jasveer Kaur”.

2.

The sequence of events, which becomes

relevant for consideration, and as also argued by

the learned counsel for the applicant is in

relations to the institution of the proceedings

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument

Act, on 12.04.2018, as it was instituted by the

respondent no.2, over the set of allegations, with

regards to the dishonoring of che

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top