SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DEEPA GOSWAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['PRABHA NAITHANI', '', 'AVIDIT NOLIYAL', 'C S C', 'SANDEEP KOTHARI']

SL.

No

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

18.11.2022

WPMS No. 2885 of 2022

Hon’ble S.K. Mishra, J.

Mrs.

Prabha

Naithani,

learned

counsel for the petitioner.

Mr.

Yogesh

Pande,

learned

Additional C.S.C. for the State.

Mr. Akshay Joshi, learned holding of

Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for

the respondent no.3.

By filing this writ petition, the

petitioner has prayed for the following

relief:

a. Issue a writ order or direction in the

nature

of

Mandamus

directing

the

respondent

authoritiesrespondent

authorities to immediately remove the

Mobile Tower installed over the land of

the

private

respondent

no.

5

at

Uttaranchal Colony, Ward No. 37, Near

Primary

School

Haripur

Gangu,

Damuwadhunga,

Haldwani

District

Nainital.

The petitioner’s grievance is that

the respondent no. 6 is installing a cell

phone tower in the lands of respondent no.

5-Deep

Chandra

Pathak,

which

is

a

residential area, in complete voilation of

guidelines issued by the State Government.

The

petitioner

has

made

a

representation to the Distri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top