SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma
MOHD ZAFAR – Appellant
Versus
MOHD SAMIULLAH ANSARI – Respondent


SL.

No

Date

Office Notes, reports,

orders or proceedings

or directions and

Registrar’s order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

WPMS No.2890 of 2021

Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Advocate for the

petitioner.

Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the

caveator/respondent.

The petitioner before this Court is a

defendant in Suit No.101 of 2015 Mohd. Samiullah

Ansari vs. Mohd. Zafar and others. In the suit in

question the plaintiff/respondent herein has sought

a degree in relation to the property as described at

the foot of the plaint, as to be lying in Khasra

No.663 Kha. The suit accompanied with it and

application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. as

well as the plaint map where the property was

described by figure a A,B,C, D showing it to be the

part and parcel of the land lying in Khasra No.663

Kha

The application filed under Order 39 Rule 1

& 2, by the plaintiff/respondent was opposed by the

defendant/petitioner by filing an objection under

order 39 Rule 4 of the C.P.C. and if the objection

under Order 39 Rule 4 of C.P.C. is taken into

consideration primarily, the fact as pleaded in para

6 of object

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top