SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

OM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Appeal No. 806 of 2001

(Old No. 297 of 2000)

1. Om Prakash

S/o Shri Babu lal

R/o village Jule

P.S Sahaspur

Dist Dehradun

2. Pappu

S/o Shri Ram Chandra

R/o Village Etanbagh

Hurbutpur, P. S

Vikas Nagar, Dist Dehradun

...........Appellants(In jail)

Versus

State of U.P (now State of Uttarakhand)

…..................Respondent

Ms. Geeta Parihar Advocate, Amicus Curiae for appellants.

Shri P.S.Bohara, Brief Holder, for the State.

Coram: Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.

Hon'ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.

Oral: Hon'ble Prafulla C.Pant, J.

This appeal, preferred under section 374 of Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973, (for short Cr.P.C), is directed

2

against the judgment and order dated 27.01.2000, passed

by IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Dehradun, in Special

Sessions Trial No. 12 of 1998, whereby said court has

convicted the appellants namely Om Prakash and Pappu

under section 376 (2) (g) of Indian Penal Code, 1860,

(for short I.P.C.) and under section 3 (2) ( V) of

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, 1989. Each of the convicts is sentenced

to rigor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top