HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma
NEERAJ SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
SL.
No
Date
Office Notes, reports,
orders or proceedings
or directions and
Registrar’s order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPSS No.1732 of 2021
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr.
Bilal
Ahmed,
Advocate
for
the
petitioners.
Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General
for the State of Uttarakhand.
The petitioners to the present writ petition
admittedly are discharging their services with the
respondents-institution, which is yet to be brought
within the grant-in-aid. In fact, the respondents
nos.4 & 5 are the institutions, which are privately
aided and they have been managing their affairs
from their own coffers, they are yet to be brought
with in grant-in-aid.
The grievance of the petitioners in the
present writ petition is as against the advertisement,
whereby the respondent nos.4 & 5 intend to fill in
the vacancies of posts, which are alleged to have
been held by the petitioner by inviting the
applications
by
issuing
advertisement
on
17.11.2011.
Since it is exclusively a private institution
and it is yet to be provincialised or brought within
the grant-in-aid, the petitioners remedy would be to
approach the Ed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.