SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAM KUMAR and OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
['APUL MISRA ARVIND VASHISHT', 'G A', 'NARENDRA SINGH', 'RAJENDRA SINGH']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT

NAINITAL

Criminal Appeal No. 1515 of 2001

(Old No. 636 of 1999)

1. Ram Kumar S/o Mamraj

2. Jaibeer @ Pappu S/o Rampal

3. Jitendra @ Jasvir S/o Rampal (since deceased)

4. Satvir S/o Rampal

5. Rampal S/o Mamraj

6. Raj Dev S/o Ram Kumar

All R/o village Akodha khurd

P.S Laksar, District Haridwar

............….Appellants

Versus

State of U.P (now State of Uttarakhand)

…..................Respondent

Shri Arvind Vashisth, Advocate present for the

appellants

Shri S.S.Adhikari, A.G.A, present for the State.

Shri Rajendra Singh, Advocate, present for the

complainant.

Coram: Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.

Hon'ble Nirmal Yadav, J.

2

Oral: Hon'ble Prafulla C.Pant, J.

This appeal, preferred under section 374 (2) of

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (for short Cr.P.C), is

directed against the judgment and order dated

16.03.1999, passed by Additional Sessions Judge

Roorkee, in Sessions Trial No. 183 of 1997, whereby

said court has convicted the appellants namely

Ramkumar, Jaibeer @ Pappu, Jitendra @ Jasvir under

section 14

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top